“The most noticeable [difference] was in the way that it reduced the amplitude of frequencies between 150Hz to 350Hz. This inevitably leads to clarity of tone. [. . .] If the guitar naturally tends to sound ‘muddy’ either in person or on recordings, the reduction in frequencies between 150Hz and 350Hz that are caused by the Droplet system would offer improved clarity to the player. [. . .] From an audio engineer’s perspective, the reduction in frequencies between 150Hz and 350Hz can mean that the instrument will sit much better in an overall mix. Personally, these are the first frequencies that I reduce when I am trying to get an acoustic guitar to sit in a mix well.”

“The second [most notable] aspect was in the sustain of the individual notes. [. . .] An interesting side effect of the increased sustain can be seen on bottom guitar strings G,B and E. During the decay, frequencies below 100Hz increase in amplitude.”

“The most noticeable [difference] was in the way that it reduced the amplitude of frequencies between 150Hz to 350Hz. This inevitably leads to clarity of tone. [. . .] If the guitar naturally tends to sound ‘muddy’ either in person or on recordings, the reduction in frequencies between 150Hz and 350Hz that are caused by the Droplet system would offer improved clarity to the player. [. . .] From an audio engineer’s perspective, the reduction in frequencies between 150Hz and 350Hz can mean that the instrument will sit much better in an overall mix. Personally, these are the first frequencies that I reduce when I am trying to get an acoustic guitar to sit in a mix well.”